September 18, 2025

18 min read

Identifying the Best Remote Patient Monitoring Companies: A 2026 Review Across Chronic Care, Post-Acute, and Hospital at Home

While understanding the distinct categories of remote monitoring is crucial, comparing the leading vendors side-by-side can help clarify their offerings. The matrix below summarizes the key players discussed in this guide, highlighting their primary focus, technology approach, service offerings, and the reimbursement models they support.The remote patient monitoring (RPM) landscape is rapidly evolving. Key trends shaping the industry include significant market consolidation, the clear emergence of cellular-enabled devices as the standard for patient adherence, and expanded reimbursement access for federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and rural health clinics (RHCs).

Despite this growth, the term "RPM" is often used as a catch-all, leading to confusion. Organizations frequently fail to achieve their goals because they select a platform misaligned with their specific use case and reimbursement strategy, whether CPT-based billing, diagnosis-related groups (DRG), or value-based ROI.

This guide defines the three distinct categories of RPM implementation and reviews leading providers in each sector to help you identify the best partner for your organization's specific goals in 2026 and beyond.

We begin with the most widely adopted form of RPM implementation in the ambulatory setting — CPT-based longitudinal monitoring — before exploring specialized models.

The Three Clinical Categories of Remote Patient Monitoring:

  1. Chronic condition/longitudinal monitoring

  2. Post-acute/transitional care monitoring

  3. Hospital at home (HaH)

Category 1: Chronic Condition/Longitudinal Monitoring

Definition: Long-term monitoring integrated into the ongoing management of chronic diseases (hypertension, diabetes, congestive health failure (CHF), obesity, etc.).

Goals: Improve long-term outcomes, prevent exacerbations, generate sustainable fee-for-service (FFS) revenue, and support value-based care infrastructure.

The Landscape and Reimbursement Model

This is the largest segment of the RPM market, focused on ambulatory settings, including practices, health systems, and FQHCs/RHCs. Reimbursement relies on CPT codes (e.g., 9945x series). This model is most effective when integrated with complementary services like chronic care management (CCM) and advanced primary care management (APCM).

The financial viability of these programs is expected to increase significantly, driven by proposed changes in the 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, including potential new codes for 10-20 minutes of care time (99XX5) and 2-15 days of readings (99XX4).

Criteria for the Best Longitudinal RPM Providers

Sustaining a longitudinal RPM program presents unique operational challenges that often cause pilots to fail. The best providers must deliver on four critical criteria:

  • Deep CMS compliance infrastructure: Mastery of intricate billing rules, precise time tracking, audit-ready documentation, and the expertise to adapt to regulatory shifts (such as the proposed 2026 changes).

  • Integrated device logistics and fulfillment (the “hidden bottleneck”): Full-service device logistics, including dedicated warehousing, direct-to-patient shipping, and refurbishment, are essential to remove substantial operational burdens from clinical staff. This is often the hidden bottleneck of RPM programs.

  • Patient-centric cellular technology: Cellular-enabled RPM devices, which transmit data automatically ("it just works"), are the industry standard for sustainable engagement and reliable data collection, vastly outperforming Bluetooth solutions for long-term adherence, especially with Medicare populations.

  • Comprehensive platform and flexible services: A unified platform supporting RPM/CCM/APCM, offering flexibility to utilize the software with internal staff or leverage outsourced clinical monitoring services.

Leading Solutions and Key Players

Providers in this space must manage the complexities of CPT-based reimbursement, long-term patient support, and scalable logistics.

  • Prevounce Health:
    • Best for: Organizations (from independent practices to health systems and FQHCs/RHCs) seeking a comprehensive, end-to-end solution prioritizing CMS compliance, operational sustainability, and integrated care (RPM/CCM/APCM).

    • Technology and devices: Features a unified software platform designed for intuitive workflows and compliance. Utilizes proprietary Pylo cellular-enabled devices (blood pressure monitors, scales, glucometers) to maximize patient adherence and data reliability.

    • Services and logistics: Offers robust, full-service logistics, including dedicated warehousing, direct-to-patient shipping, and refurbishment. Provides flexible service models: software-only, fully outsourced clinical care management, or a hybrid approach.

    • Distinctions: Recognized for deep compliance expertise and proven scalability (supporting 160-plus healthcare organizations with 16 million-plus patient readings received and 80,000-plus deployed RPM devices).
  • TimeDoc Health:
    • Best for: Organizations, including FQHCs and RHCs, prioritizing deep EHR integration and extensive outsourced clinical staffing for both CCM and RPM.

    • Technology and devices: Focuses on integrating data from a mix of cellular and Bluetooth devices.

    • Services and logistics: Emphasizes staff augmentation, with a significant portion of their business utilizing their outsourced care management services to manage patient outreach and monitoring.

    • Distinctions: Helps support organizations with limited internal resources or staffing through staffed care management services that reduce administrative burden.

  • Rimidi:
    • Best for: Practices focused on clinical decision support and optimizing workflows for specific patient condition groups.

    • Technology and devices: A software-first platform that integrates data from various connected devices (cellular and Bluetooth) and combines it with other clinical data to drive guideline-based care.

    • Services and logistics: Focuses primarily on software and clinical pathways rather than extensive outsourced services or logistics management.

    • Distinctions: Strong emphasis on specific disease states (like diabetes, heart failure, and obesity) and providing actionable clinical insights directly at the point of care.

  • HealthSnap:
    • Best for: Organizations looking to aggregate and analyze holistic patient data from multiple sources for proactive population health management.

    • Technology and devices: Focuses on creating a comprehensive patient profile by integrating data from RPM devices, wearables, EHR data, and social determinants of health (SDOH). Supports a range of cellular and Bluetooth devices.

    • Services and Logistics: Offers logistics support and outsourced clinical monitoring services to provide a turnkey solution.

    • Distinctions: Emphasizes artificial intelligence (AI)-driven analytics and risk stratification to identify emerging patient risks across the continuum of care.

Category 2: Post-Acute and Transitional Care Monitoring

Definition: Time-limited monitoring, typically spanning 30–90 days, initiated immediately following discharge from an inpatient hospital stay or a skilled nursing facility (SNF).

Goals: Prevent avoidable hospital readmissions, ensure medication adherence during the transition home, monitor the recovery trajectory, and support transitional care management (TCM) workflows.

The Landscape and Financial Drivers

The period immediately following a hospital stay is a highly vulnerable time for patients. Post-acute monitoring focuses intensely on stabilizing the patient during this critical window. Unlike longitudinal monitoring, this category is episodic and centered on the transition of care.

The financial drivers here are distinctly different from the CPT-based revenue model of chronic care. For health systems, the primary incentive is often cost avoidance and quality improvement:

  • Penalty avoidance (HRRP): The most significant financial driver is mitigating penalties under the CMS Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP). Hospitals face substantial financial penalties if patients with specific conditions, like heart failure or post-surgical complications, are readmitted within 30 days. Remote monitoring provides the necessary oversight to intervene quickly and prevent an avoidable return to the hospital.

  • Quality metrics and value-based incentives: Effective transitional care significantly impacts key quality metrics. Health systems, accountable care organizations (ACOs), and Medicare Advantage plans are incentivized to improve HEDIS scores and Star Ratings. While CPT codes can sometimes be billed during this period, the primary ROI for the deploying organization is realized through reduced penalties and improved performance in value-based contracts.

Key Operational Requirements

Post-acute monitoring presents specific operational challenges due to its episodic nature:

  • Rapid deployment at discharge: Success requires seamless integration into the discharge workflow. Organizations must be able to rapidly equip patients with monitoring kits and provide education before they leave the acute facility or immediately upon arrival home.
  • Care coordination and TCM workflows: The monitoring platform must facilitate TCM protocols. This includes timely follow-up appointments, medication reconciliation, and clear communication channels between the hospitalist team, home health agencies, and the patient’s ambulatory providers.
  • Episodic technology management: Since the monitoring is time-limited, organizations must have highly efficient processes for retrieving, sanitizing, refurbishing, and redeploying monitoring kits, presenting a unique logistical challenge.

Leading Solutions and Key Players

Solutions in this category are optimized for reducing readmissions, supporting 30-90 day episodes of care, and often integrate closely with home health services and enterprise health systems.

  • Health Recovery Solutions (HRS):
    • Best for: Large health systems and home health agencies (HHA) seeking an enterprise-scale solution that bridges post-acute care and long-term monitoring.

    • Technology and devices: Offers the PatientConnect® platform, which supports various modalities, including cellular devices, bring your own device (BYOD), and often utilizes tablet-based kits (PatientConnect Complete) for enhanced patient engagement, education, and TCM workflows.

    • Services and logistics: Provides comprehensive logistics through its HomeDirect program (delivery, installation, refurbishment) and outsourced clinical monitoring via CareConnect.

    • Distinctions: A major market player (400-plus clients, 1 million-plus lives impacted) with a strong track record in KLAS rankings. Known for robust, in-house EHR integration capabilities and flexibility across multiple care settings.

  • Vivify Health (Part of Optum):
    • Best for: Large health systems, payers, and ACOs seeking a highly scalable and configurable platform for transitional care and population health.

    • Technology and devices: Offers flexible technology pathways, ranging from BYOD solutions to fully kitted tablet and cellular/Bluetooth-enabled peripherals.

    • Services and logistics: Provides logistics support for kitted solutions and emphasizes pathways that can be rapidly customized based on patient risk levels and conditions.

    • Distinctions: As part of Optum, Vivify is deeply integrated into the broader payer and large health system ecosystem, focusing on reducing the total cost of care and managing utilization.

  • Cadence:

    • Best for: Large health systems seeking enterprise partnerships to manage high-risk chronic conditions, including the critical post-discharge window for CHF and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

    • Technology and devices: Utilizes cellular connectivity integrated into their platform for reliable data transmission.

    • Services and logistics: Employs fully outsourced clinical teams (NPs/RNs) acting as an extension of the health system. Logistics are included in its comprehensive service model.

    • Distinctions: While also a strong player in longitudinal care, its deep clinical partnerships and adherence to specific, evidence-based clinical pathways make them effective in managing high-acuity transitions and preventing exacerbations post-discharge.

Category 3: Hospital at Home (HaH)

Definition: High-acuity monitoring and medical treatment provided in the home as a direct substitute for traditional inpatient hospital care for conditions such as pneumonia, acute CHF, complex infections, and COPD exacerbations.

Goals: Reduce inpatient length of stay (LOS), increase hospital bed capacity, lower the cost of acute care delivery, and improve patient satisfaction.

The Landscape and Regulatory Environment

HaH is the most intensive form of remote monitoring. It is not merely enhanced oversight; it is a comprehensive care delivery model that shifts the location of hospitalization from the brick-and-mortar facility to the patient's home.

This model is fundamentally different from CPT-based RPM and operates within a distinct regulatory framework centered on the CMS Acute Hospital Care at Home Waiver.

  • The waiver system: To operate a HaH program, hospitals must obtain a waiver from CMS, which allows them to provide inpatient care outside of the physical hospital building. The growth of this model has been significant; as of late 2025, over 400 hospitals across 142 health systems have been approved to operate under this waiver.

  • The future outlook: The primary challenge in this category is regulatory dependence. The waiver expired at the end of September 2025, and the long-term future of the HaH model remains dependent on Congressional action to make these flexibilities permanent. This uncertainty can create challenges for organizations considering the significant investment required.

Reimbursement Model: The DRG System

Crucially, HaH is not reimbursed through outpatient CPT codes. Instead, it is paid under the Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) via DRGs, which is the same payment a hospital receives for a traditional inpatient stay.

This reimbursement model is necessary to support the high level of investment in technology, staffing, and logistics required to ensure the care delivered meets the rigorous standards of inpatient hospitalization.

Key Operational Requirements

HaH programs demand significant infrastructure and specialized capabilities far exceeding those of ambulatory RPM:

  • High-acuity technology stack: The technology must support high-frequency, often continuous data transmission. This frequently involves sophisticated wearable biosensors, continuous vital sign monitoring, and advanced predictive analytics to detect patient deterioration early.

  • 24/7 command centers and rapid response: Organizations must maintain clinical command centers staffed 24/7 by physicians and nurses. Furthermore, they must have the infrastructure to rapidly deploy in-home visits (e.g., paramedics, nurses) if an emergency arises.

  • Complex in-home logistics: HaH requires orchestration of a complex ecosystem of in-home services, including infusion therapy, durable medical equipment (DME) setup, oxygen delivery, meal delivery, and potentially imaging services.

  • Deep EHR integration: Seamless, bidirectional integration with the inpatient EHR (e.g., Epic, Cerner) is essential for managing orders, documentation, and care transitions as if the patient were in a physical bed.

Leading Solutions and Key Players

This space requires specialized platforms capable of managing high-acuity patients, complex logistics orchestration, and compliance with the rigorous requirements of the CMS waiver.

  • Biofourmis (merged with CopilotIQ in October 2024):
    • Best for: Large health systems implementing acute HaH programs and seeking advanced, AI-driven predictive analytics and proprietary biosensor technology.

    • Technology and devices: Utilizes proprietary, FDA-cleared wearable biosensor patches for continuous vital sign monitoring (heart rate, respiratory rate, temp, etc.) with built-in cellular transmission. The platform features the Biovitals® AI-powered predictive analytics engine.

    • Services and logistics: Offers comprehensive care orchestration technology and provides fully outsourced virtual care teams (physicians, nurses, APPs) for 24/7 monitoring. Coordinates a national network of partners for in-home service delivery.

    • Distinctions: A leader in the HaH technology space, significantly strengthened by the strategic merger with CopilotIQ. Known for its sophisticated analytics and strong track record (70,000-plus patients served through HaH).

  • Current Health (Best Buy Health):
    • Best for: Health systems looking for scalable technology combined with robust in-home logistics and support infrastructure.

    • Technology and Devices: Offers an FDA-cleared RPM platform that includes continuous monitoring wearables and integrates with various peripheral devices.

    • Services and logistics: The key differentiator is leveraging Best Buy’s infrastructure. This includes utilizing the Geek Squad for rapid in-home technology setup, onboarding, and technical support, addressing a major logistical hurdle in HaH deployment.

    • Distinctions: Combines a proven remote care platform with the national scale of Best Buy's logistics and support services.

  • Inbound Health:
    • Best for: Health systems seeking a strategic partner to customize and launch comprehensive HaH and SNF-at-home programs based on proven operational models.

    • Technology and devices: Provides a proprietary technology platform designed to orchestrate the complex workflows of acute care at home, including supply chain management and labor coordination. They are often device-agnostic, focusing on the operational workflow.

    • Services and logistics: Focuses on the operational enablement of the health system, offering customized supply chain solutions, analytics, virtual care teams, and operational blueprints.

    • Distinctions: Spun out of a large health system (Allina Health), providing deep operational expertise grounded in actual health system operations and proven workflows.

2026 RPM Vendor Comparison Matrix

While understanding the distinct categories of remote monitoring is crucial, comparing the leading vendors side-by-side can help clarify their offerings. The matrix below summarizes the key players discussed in this guide, highlighting their primary focus, technology approach, service offerings, and the reimbursement models they support.

How to use this matrix:

  • Components offered: Indicates if the vendor typically provides the technology platform, the physical devices, logistical management (shipping/returns), and outsourced clinical staff.

  • Device connectivity: Highlights the primary method used for data transmission, which is a critical factor for patient adherence and data reliability.

  • Primary reimbursement model: Identifies the financial pathway the solution is optimized for.

Vendor Name Primary Use Case Focus Primary Components Offered Primary Device Connectivity Primary Device Connectivity
Primary Reimbursement Model

CHRONIC/LONGITUDINAL CARE

Prevounce Health

Chronic Care (RPM/CCM/APCM)

Software, Devices (Proprietary), Logistics, Clinical Services

Cellular

FFS

TimeDoc Health

Chronic Care (RPM/CCM)

Services

Cellular, Bluetooth

FFS

Rimidi

Chronic Care (RPM/CCM)

Software

Cellular, Bluetooth, BYOD

FFS

HealthSnap

Chronic Care (RPM/CCM)

Software, Services

Cellular, Bluetooth, BYOD

FFS

POST-ACUTE/TRANSITIONAL CARE

Health Recovery Solutions (HRS)

Post-Acute

Software, Devices, Logistics, Clinical Services

Tablet-based, BYOD

VBC

Vivify Health

Post-Acute, Payer/VBC

Software, Devices, Logistics

Tablet-based, BYOD

VBC

Cadence

Chronic Care, Post-Acute (High Acuity)

Software, Devices, Logistics, Clinical Services

Tablet-based, Cellular

VBC

HOSPITAL AT HOME (HaH)

Inbound Health

Hospital at Home, SNF at Home

Software, Services, Logistics (Orchestration)

Device Agnostic

DRG

Biofourmis

Hospital at Home

Software, Wearables, Logistics, Clinical Services

Wearables (Proprietary)

DRG

Current Health

Hospital at Home

Software, Wearables, Logistics (via Best Buy)

Wearables, Peripherals

DRG

(VBC = Value-based care; FFS = Fee-for-service; DRG = Diagnosis-related group; BYOD = Bring your own device)

Define the Mission Before the Technology

The remote patient monitoring market is diverse and rapidly evolving. While the underlying technology may appear similar across different categories, the operational expertise, compliance infrastructure, reimbursement models, and service requirements necessary for success are vastly different.

Attempting to force a HaH solution into a chronic care model — or vice versa — is a recipe for operational failure, compliance risk, and financial loss. Organizations must first clearly define their mission, identify the appropriate reimbursement pathway, and then select a partner specialized in that specific domain.

Summary of recommendations:

  • For longitudinal chronic care (RPM/CCM/APCM): Practices, health systems, and FQHCs/RHCs seeking to build sustainable, scalable remote care programs require a partner that excels in CMS compliance, integrated logistics, and patient-friendly cellular technology. Prevounce Health offers the leading end-to-end solution designed specifically for the complexities of long-term, integrated remote care management.

  • For post-acute and transitional care: Health systems focused on reducing readmission penalties (HRRP) and managing 30-90 day episodes of care should look to solutions optimized for TCM workflows and rapid deployment, such as HRS, Vivify Health, or Cadence.

  • For hospital at home: Organizations participating in the CMS waiver and seeking to maximize DRG reimbursement for high-acuity care require specialized platforms with 24/7 command centers and advanced logistics, such as those offered by Biofourmis, Current Health, or Inbound Health.

The future of healthcare is connected and increasingly delivered in the home. By understanding the distinct categories of RPM, you can ensure your organization chooses the right partner to succeed in 2026 and beyond.

Frequently Asked Questions

How should organizations choose the right RPM partner?

Selecting the right remote patient monitoring partner starts with clearly defining your organization’s mission and reimbursement model. Determine whether your goal is chronic care management, readmission reduction, or acute care at home. The most successful programs align technology, operations, and compliance with that mission.

Prevounce Health stands out as a partner that helps organizations build sustainable, compliant, and scalable RPM programs, from CPT-based chronic care models to integrated CCM and APCM workflows.

To read more about how to choose the best RPM partner, read “How to Actually Find the Best Remote Patient Monitoring Company.”

What are the main categories of RPM, and how does Prevounce fit into them?

The three main categories of RPM are:

  • Chronic condition/longitudinal monitoring: Long-term disease management using CPT-based reimbursement codes.

  • Post-acute/transitional care monitoring: Short-term monitoring for 30 to 90 days after hospital discharge to prevent readmissions and support transitional care.

  • Hospital at home (HaH): High-acuity inpatient-level care delivered in the home, reimbursed under DRGs.

Prevounce specializes in the chronic/longitudinal category, providing an end-to-end solution built around CMS compliance, cellular-enabled devices, and full-service logistics for long-term success.

If you’d like to learn more, we dive deeper into these three main categories of RPM and one subcategory in this piece: “The 4 Major Categories of Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM)

What makes Prevounce Health different from other RPM providers?

Prevounce focuses on providing the most complete, compliance-driven RPM platform on the market. Unlike vendors that focus only on software or staffing, Prevounce delivers:

  • Comprehensive coverage: Software, devices, logistics, and clinical services.

  • Proprietary cellular-enabled Pylo devices for seamless patient engagement.

  • Flexible service models: Software-only, hybrid, or fully managed.

  • Integrated chronic care programs combining RPM, CCM, and APCM under one platform.

This combination allows organizations to build profitable, high-performing remote care programs.

What results have clients achieved with Prevounce?

Prevounce Health delivers measurable results across a diverse range of healthcare organizations, including health systems, physician practices, specialty groups such as cardiology and internal medicine, and FQHCs and RHCs. To learn more about how Prevounce has helped these organizations improve patient outcomes and financial performance, read our case studies highlighting real-world success stories.

How does Prevounce integrate with existing care management programs?

Prevounce unifies RPM, CCM, and APCM in one comprehensive remote care management platform, turning disconnected programs into a single, scalable care ecosystem.

  • RPM and CCM: Continuous monitoring and monthly care coordination that improve outcomes and maximize CPT-based reimbursement.

  • RPM and APCM: Real-time patient data combined with proactive population health management to drive value-based performance.

The result: a unified platform that helps practices, specialties, FQHCs/RHCs, hospitals and health systems deliver connected, high-performing remote care.

Discover How Leading Organizations Succeed with Prevounce

To explore your options and learn how your organization can benefit from a comprehensive remote care management program, book a demo of the Prevounce RPM software with a remote care management expert.

 

Subscribe to our newsletter