Physicians Come Out En Masse to Praise Remote Physiologic Monitoring

Read More
Physicians Come Out En Masse to Praise Remote Physiologic Monitoring
by Daniel Tashnek

Multiple Medicare administrative contractors (MACs) recently held a virtual, multi-jurisdictional meeting to discuss efficacy of remote physiologic monitoring (RPM) and remote therapeutic monitoring (RTM). The meeting lasted two-plus hours and included commentary from more than 50 subject matter experts, mostly physicians from various specialties who have experience with RPM and RTM.

Members of the Prevounce team, including myself, listened to the program, which was not only highly informative but encouraging. Not a single expert spoke negatively about their RPM or RTM experience. They spoke of the power of remote care to improve access, reduce inequities and social determinants of health barriers, strengthen patient engagement, cut costs, and ultimately improve outcomes. I am grateful to these physicians that they spoke up and took the time to share their stories.

As the founder of a healthcare software company that helps providers deliver remote patient management, chronic care management, and preventive services, I am obviously on the pro-RPM/RTM side. It was great to hear so many providers line up to talk through their positive experiences. Many of them were similar to the powerful anecdotes we hear every day at Prevounce, while others — such as the podiatrists who shared stories of how RPM and RTM have benefitted their patients and practices — provided us with fresh perspectives we don't typically have access to.

I also greatly appreciated the arguments made about not curtailing coverage while outcome data is currently being gathered in earnest. Between the short time the codes have been out, the yearly changes to the CPT requirements, and the huge, confounding variable that was the COVID-19 pandemic, it is difficult to argue that we already have the outcome insight to make sweeping changes — particularly for conditions and disease states where we have strong anecdotal evidence but where research is just getting started.

We will have more to say about the topics covered in this meeting and the future of RPM and RTM down the road. You can look for this commentary or links to it on social media (LinkedInTwitter, and Facebook). We'll also be sharing links to the recording and transcript of the MAC meeting when they're made available, hopefully in the coming days.

If the topics covered in the MAC meeting interest you, I invite you to connect with me personally on LinkedIn. I am always looking to expand my network of others in this space.

All Posts

Related Posts

Examples of Remote Patient Monitoring: 9 Top Patient Applications

The use of remote patient monitoring — i.e., remote physiologic monitoring or RPM — has surged over the past few years. It's been widely embraced by providers, patients, the federal government, and an increasing number of commercial payers. Numerous statistics show the value of RPM, and when we look at some of the more common examples of remote patient monitoring applications, it is easy how RPM is transforming the delivery of care in the United States. 

Quick Guide: Remote Patient Monitoring CPT Codes to Know in 2024

Over the last few years, remote patient monitoring (RPM), also referred to as remote physiologic monitoring, became one of the more lucrative Medicare care management programs. Using average 2024 RPM reimbursement rates, if 100 patients are enrolled in an RPM program and each receives the minimum care management services each month, that will generate annual reimbursement of nearly $113,000.

AMA Weighing Substantial Expansion of Remote Patient Monitoring Codes

The American Medical Association (AMA) has announced the agenda for its second quarter 2024 CPT Editorial Panel meeting in May, and it includes discussion on what would be a significant and welcome expansion of remote patient monitoring (RPM) and remote therapeutic monitoring (RTM) CPT codes.