OIG Report Provides Insight Into Telehealth Use By Medicare Beneficiaries

Read More
OIG Report Provides Insight Into Telehealth Use By Medicare Beneficiaries
by Lucy Lamboley

The U.S. Office of Inspector General (OIG) has issued a "data snapshot" report about the relationship between Medicare beneficiaries and providers for telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic.

For the report, OIG reviewed Medicare claims data for telehealth services provided from March through December 2020. Here are eight of the key takeaways:

1. 26 million beneficiaries received at least one telehealth service during this period. That represents nearly 2 out of every 5 Medicare beneficiaries (39%).

2. Just more than half of these beneficiaries were enrolled in traditional Medicare fee-for-service. The remainder were enrolled in Medicare Advantage.

3. More than 80% of all beneficiaries received all their telehealth services from providers with whom they had an established relationship, meaning they had an in-person visit or other service with their providers prior to the telehealth service. The remaining beneficiaries received telehealth services from at least one provider with whom they had no prior relationship.

4. Traditional Medicare beneficiaries were more likely than Medicare Advantage beneficiaries to receive telehealth services from providers with whom they had an established relationship.

5. Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries who had established relationships with providers had an in-person visit an average of four months prior to their first telehealth service.

6. The most common telehealth services received by both groups of beneficiaries were e-visits and virtual check-ins (i.e., brief telephone calls and online interactions via patient portals) and telephone evaluation and management (E/M) services (i.e., telephone calls to discuss a medical condition).

7. Beneficiaries received about 45.5 million office visits delivered via telehealth. This accounted for nearly half (49%) of all telehealth services provided during the March through December 2020 period. These visits include services with primary care providers and specialists.

8. For the most common telehealth services, a healthy majority (70+ percent) of beneficiaries saw providers with whom they had an established relationship. This includes the aforementioned services as well as such services as remote patient monitoring, preventive services, and psychotherapy. The only outlier: home visits, at 34%.

Access the data snapshot by clicking here.

Are You Following RPM Compliance? Download the Free Guide.

All Posts

Related Posts

Quick Guide: Remote Patient Monitoring CPT Codes to Know in 2024

Over the last few years, remote patient monitoring (RPM), also referred to as remote physiologic monitoring, became one of the more lucrative Medicare care management programs. Using average 2024 RPM reimbursement rates, if 100 patients are enrolled in an RPM program and each receives the minimum care management services each month, that will generate annual reimbursement of nearly $113,000.

AMA Weighing Substantial Expansion of Remote Patient Monitoring Codes

The American Medical Association (AMA) has announced the agenda for its second quarter 2024 CPT Editorial Panel meeting in May, and it includes discussion on what would be a significant and welcome expansion of remote patient monitoring (RPM) and remote therapeutic monitoring (RTM) CPT codes.

What is Chronic Care Management: Definition and Key Concepts

Thinking about launching a chronic care management program? Looking to grow an existing CCM program? Don't miss our special webinar, "What Chronic Care Management Success Looks Like in 2024," on March 26. Learn more and register! Chronic care management (CCM) made its debut in 2015 when it was rolled out by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) as a separately paid service under the Medicare fee schedule. The rationale behind its inception was to offer an avenue of compensation for practitioners who provided care to their patients outside of the normal confines of the average office visit. The introduction of CCM coincidentally led to a more efficient means of care teams proactively engaging and managing patients with problematic chronic diseases, in turn improving outcomes and reducing treatment costs. CCM also gave providers a new opportunity to generate meaning and recurring revenue. Chronic care management has been a win-win for patients and practitioners — and the healthcare system as a whole — for nearly 10 years now.