The Office of Inspector General (OIG) recently announced it had completed an audit of payments for chronic care management (CCM) services. The results of this audit have short- and long-term implications for providers of CCM services and for the vendors of CCM software that support those providers.
Big Picture: CMS reaffirmed its support and future coverage of chronic care management services in its recent proposed rule concurrently with this OIG audit of historic payments for improperly coded or documented CCM services. Taken together, this shows that while CMS is advancing the reimbursement and other incentives for performing care management services, it is also making sure that those incentives are not used by providers that fail to follow the rules and requirements. Training providers and staff on CCM requirements and using a CCM software that enforces compliance are crucial to the long-term health of any care services program and to avoid expensive audits and clawbacks.
Here are some of the key takeaways from the chronic care management audit.
The OIG audit covered more than 7.8 million claims submitted by physicians and more than 240,000 claims submitted by hospitals for noncomplex and complex chronic care management services provided in 2017 and 2018.
CMS aimed to determine whether payments made by the agency for the two types of chronic care management services — noncomplex and complex — during 2017 and 2018 complied with federal requirements. As OIG notes, "CCM services are a relatively new category of Medicare-covered services and are at higher risk for overpayments." This audit expands on the findings of a previous audit that found CMS lacked sufficient controls to ensure Medicare payments for noncomplex CCM services during 2015 and 2016 complied with federal requirements.
The audit determined that there were $1.9 million in overpayments associated with about 50,000 claims for noncomplex and complex chronic care management services rendered during 2017 and 2018. This is broken down as follows:
From these claims, beneficiaries' cost sharing totaled up to about $541,000. OIG noted that the overpayment errors occurred because CMS lacked claim system edits to prevent and detect overpayments.
OIG issued several recommendations for CMS, including the following:
In the short term, providers of chronic care management services contacted by Medicare contractors will need to take the necessary steps to refund the overpayments to Medicare and any affected beneficiaries. Access the full OIG audit report here.
In the longer term, the chronic care management audit's results suggest that CMS will be stepping up its oversight of the Medicare chronic care management program — especially considering the agency's plans to support the growth of CCM, including increasing reimbursement for 2022. Providers must ensure that they are properly coding and billing for chronic care management services or they could face compliance violation penalties. This makes it particularly important that providers ensure the software they are using to help bill for CCM services places compliance as a top priority.
To learn how Prevounce delivers personalized, CMS-compliant CCM solutions that fit seamlessly into a provider's workflow, schedule a demo today.